tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4621870241578115752.post2655318390416040664..comments2023-11-03T19:49:16.873+08:00Comments on The Marginal Dimension 边缘维度: 占领全球,打倒资本主义?冷眼http://www.blogger.com/profile/03925267159509264474noreply@blogger.comBlogger23125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4621870241578115752.post-41521999417462635162011-11-10T14:23:12.616+08:002011-11-10T14:23:12.616+08:00TW, 感谢你很用心地回应,很抱歉这么迟才答复。之前可能有点误会,过去的就算了吧!
你说的那种资本...TW, 感谢你很用心地回应,很抱歉这么迟才答复。之前可能有点误会,过去的就算了吧!<br /><br />你说的那种资本主义只能存在理论上,一种无政府状态中。在现实中,经济制度不能独立于政治而存在,所以有朋党资本主义、国家资本主义、放任自流资本主义等形态,后者最接近你所形容的资本主义。你的观点接近新自由主义和奥地利学派,只是新自由主义也主张政府提供基本教育、基本医疗和基础设施(取代津贴)。<br /><br />如果你仔细阅读我上面的文章,就知道我没有否定资本主义的好处,我提倡的是较完美地结合资本主义和社会主义。<br /><br />你说的资本主义的正面效应是事实,但你忽略了负面效应。在你所提出的纯粹资本主义下,资本会不断追求最大的经济效益,社会效益就会受到忽略,资源和环境也会不断受到破坏。比方说,发展商把最好的地段都建了办公大楼、商场、高级住宅等,中下层人士都被挤到边远地带去,甚至无一瓦遮头。更严重的是,掌握生产要素的资本阶级会不断以钱生钱,无产阶级难以向上流动,造成贫者愈贫,富者愈富。资本家积累资本,而资本可以换取政治影响力,最终导致朋党资本主义。举个例子,相对于公务员待遇年年改善,马来西亚还有很多园丘工人只领日薪,每月只靠4、5百块钱苦撑一家几口的生活。如果实行你的资本主义,就不能有最低工资规定,这个社群就永远无法翻身了。<br /><br />你提出“大政府”的坏处,我完全赞同。(如果你有看过我其他文章的话,就知道我是最强烈反对公务员队伍无度膨胀的。)不过,你有一点误解:“大政府”不一定就是社会主义,而完全可以是资本主义;政府干预不一定就是社会主义,而完全可以是资本主义。马来西亚就是最佳例子:一方面,公务员队伍无度膨胀,政府营运开支不住上涨;另一方面,公共服务质量低下、公共产品供应不足。这其实是国家功能弱化的表现,原因就是国家被分利集团(包括政府领袖、资本家、官僚等)所骑劫,以公共资源自肥。<br /><br />你说的国内政治问题,我完全认同,也曾在不同的文章里提到。不过,政治问题要以政治手段解决,资本主义解决不了政治问题。你把问题归咎于政府,并没有错,只是忽略了在政府背后那只手。<br /><br />你说“the increase in the poor and rich gap is because of inflation. In an inflationary economy, everyone is worse off, that's includes the rich, the middle class and the poor. The only difference is the person who suffers the most is the poor.”这句话有点矛盾。通货膨胀就是资产、商品与服务价格总水平相对于通货的上涨,资产阶级掌握资产、商品与服务,其相对财富只涨不跌,无产阶级就刚好相反。举个例子,与通货膨胀相反的是通货紧缩。每当经济下滑或萧条,资本主义世界总是会提起通货紧缩的忧虑,因为它使资本家失去定价能力,影响财富积累;这从反面证明通货膨胀对资本家有利。你说“it is not rising prices that cause inflation but rather the rising prices is the side effect of inflation”,这句话不合逻辑。<br /><br />你反对货币政策,然而在联储局于1913年成立以前,美国经济和市场就曾在1869、1873、1884、1896、1901和1907年出现大危机。在大多数时候,政府通过利率等货币政策和财政政策影响市场,其背后并非凯恩斯主义思想,而是短期政治利益的驱动和资本家的影响。这一点必须分清楚。<br /><br />你说“If people want to help the poor, they should do it on the society level, which means donate to private charities to maximize the donations channeled to the poor.” 你忽略了人的尊严,而且授人以鱼不如授人以渔。不过,你说的这种思路倒很常见,国阵和朋党就是这么做的。最近就有10多个资本家通过收购“大马彩”,成立“公益基金”资助非主流教育。也有树桐商一方面大搞官商勾结破坏环境,另一方面大办“慈善”,甚至用公众的善款往自己脸上贴金。一个公正的社会,并不需要有太多慈善事业。<br /><br />如果按照你的说法去做,经济发展会迅速;如果按照我的说法去做,虽然经济发展不会那么迅速,但国家和世界的整体发展会更平衡、公正、可持续。这是我们之间的根本差异。冷眼https://www.blogger.com/profile/03925267159509264474noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4621870241578115752.post-34368877560366720442011-11-05T18:44:41.276+08:002011-11-05T18:44:41.276+08:00By limiting the government and prevent it to creat...By limiting the government and prevent it to create GLCs, this will reduce the cronies capitalism and prevent private corporation to lobby the government because this small government will have no benefits to give. With a more equal playing ground, companies are allowed to earn a profit by competing with each other to offer products and services that is value for money. Ultimately the consumers will benefit from this business competition. With a smaller government, we can also reduce company taxes. Companies can keep most of it profits and use it to fund its future business expansion. This will help to increase employment or produces goods and services the society wants. If not, the extra cash can be distribute to its shareholders and employees through dividends and bonuses to increase their wealth.<br />Finally, I think people should understand that it is impossible to ask the government to take care of everybody in everything by offering various kind of social security program. Firstly it is costly running by government (layer of bureaucrats which discourage efficiency). Secondly, a lot of social programs are created with a good intention but end up having a lot of unintended consequences such as the EPF system. The EPF system is created to encourage people the save for their retirement and reduce government burden in helping the aging populations. However, this system end up becoming the low cost ATM machine for the government to borrow more to run its unsustainable expenditures and bailing out the failing cronies companies. The more the people demand from the government the much easier for the government to turn into a tyrannical state. <br />So, what I think the people should demand from the government are:<br />i) To stay out from the market because government only know how to make economic mistakes.<br />ii) Restore the independency of the court system and constitution to ensure our basic human rights such as freedom of speech and ensure personal liberty.TWnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4621870241578115752.post-23702573715132919592011-11-05T18:43:42.382+08:002011-11-05T18:43:42.382+08:00The Solutions
My suggestion on solving the problem...The Solutions<br />My suggestion on solving the problems (for Malaysia) will be- limited government, true capitalism, and restore the independency of the legal system and the constitutions.<br />We should limit the power of the government such as government should only be allowed to provides securities such as policemen, firemen and national defense. Government should be forbidden to create any government link or sponsored companies. Government should abolish any form of subsidies, entitlements and keep the law and regulations on businesses to the minimum. A fixed debt limit (cannot be changed whatsoever) should be imposed to prevent the government to borrow perpetually (I agree with you on this suggestion), stop the central bank to artificially to manipulate the interest rates. By doing these, we can keep the government small to reduce the government expenditures and reduce government intervention in the free market. Then we can reduce personal income taxes. In fact, I am more in favor in abolishing personal income taxes and replace by other taxes such as consumption taxes (GST). The reason being is that I do not think it is morally correct to tax people in the fruit of their labor, regardless the person is poor, middle class or rich. I am not sure whether you are in the 1% of the 99%. If you are in the 99%, I would rather you can pay zero income tax so that you can save and invest the money for your retirement. If you are the 1%, I do not think it is right too to tax you with higher taxation. I would prefer to leave the money with you so that you can save the money in bank so that the bank has genuine savings to lend to viable business or invest in business which will resulted in more hiring or produce product that the society wants. If people want to help the poor, they should do it on the society level, which means donate to private charities to maximize the donations channeled to the poor. We should not ask the government to tax the rich more to help the poor because most of the donations will be squandered away by the bureaucrats.TWnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4621870241578115752.post-79854614208463234022011-11-05T18:43:07.864+08:002011-11-05T18:43:07.864+08:00(link from Government is the problem)
Personally, ...(link from Government is the problem)<br />Personally, I also do not think the suggestion on suggesting the above policies to be adopted internationally because it is politically impossible to succeed due to every countries have their own economy objectives.TWnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4621870241578115752.post-13879629466484357312011-11-05T18:40:27.940+08:002011-11-05T18:40:27.940+08:00Personal Note: I feel that the people should not o...Personal Note: I feel that the people should not occupy the Wallstreet. In fact, they should occupy the White House and the Federal Reserve because both institutions are the main culprits.<br />Lastly, I would like to thank you for your past constructive and challenging comments which help me to rethink my position carefully. Thank you.TWnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4621870241578115752.post-41735527717078688812011-11-05T18:34:27.087+08:002011-11-05T18:34:27.087+08:00Government is the problem
Hence, I would like to p...Government is the problem<br />Hence, I would like to point out that all the problems that we are having now- inflation, speculation, cronies capitalism, corruption, increase in poor and rich income inequality and etc is because of the government. Personally I do not think that we can solve these problem by increase taxation on the rich, increase taxation on luxurious goods, increase public goods and service and subsidies, increase social security expenditure by the governments and etc. Reason being is that the root cause of the problem we have now is the government. For example, the Malaysia government is already in gorilla size. If we demand the government to provide more public goods and services, we will easily turn the gorilla size government into a Godzilla size monster. That time we will see more inflation, more cronies capitalism, corruption and increase in income inequality between the rich and poor.TWnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4621870241578115752.post-30406504958846539662011-11-05T18:33:35.906+08:002011-11-05T18:33:35.906+08:00The increase in Poor-Rich gap and Inflation
My vie...The increase in Poor-Rich gap and Inflation<br />My view on the increase in the poor and rich gap is because of inflation. In an inflationary economy, everyone is worse off, that's includes the rich, the middle class and the poor. The only difference is the person who suffers the most is the poor. <br />I would like to point out that it is not rising prices that cause inflation but rather the rising prices is the side effect of inflation. The root cause of inflation is because of the government and central bank simply increase the money supply without control through its expansionary monetary and expansionary economic policies. Almost all the governments are manipulating its currencies and flooding the system with cheap credits and causing inflation in all asset classes, services and goods.TWnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4621870241578115752.post-36960490569453738032011-11-05T18:32:55.531+08:002011-11-05T18:32:55.531+08:00The boom-bust cycle.
It is my view that the boom-b...The boom-bust cycle.<br />It is my view that the boom-bust cycle is a nature phenomenon. Each industry has good times and bad times. However, if we look at a country economy as a whole, not all industries will have good times and bad times together. Similarly, not all countries will enjoy economic growth at the same time. But what has gone wrong in the world economy is that countries in Asia, Europe and America continent can grow almost the same pace together- boom together and bust together. And worse thing is the boom-bust cycle become much shorter. Why is that so? I believe that this happen is because the boom-bust cycle the world is having now is induced by irresponsible credit expansion by the governments. The fiat monetary system the world is using now allows the governments to print money out from thin air(debt monetizing) and the artificially interest rate manipulation by the central bank. <br />In a free market and sound money environment, lending interest rates will be determined by the amount of deposits the people save in the bank. Interest rate will increase when the borrower is more than the saver and vice versa. When the interest rate becomes higher, not all companies will want to borrow in high interest rate to increase their production because this business expansion will be not be profitable. Government also could not perpetually run huge budget deficit because there will be no person would lend to the government.<br />Hence, the boom we had was credit expansionary boom- too much expansionary monetary and fiscal policies by the government. For example, imagine the boom is an artificial high when a person drink a lot of alcohol. In order to have a clear mind again, the person has to vomit out the excessive alcohol in his body. We could not recover the person to a clear-state of mind by making him to drink more alcohol. Right now the free market forces is trying to contract the money supply in the system, which you will see rising in interest rates and collapsing of uncompetitive companies. Rather than letting the free market to correct, the government is doing everything the Keynesian suggested- more stimulus packages regardless of how huge the government debt is, lower the interest rates to stimulate the demand regardless how indebt the society is. And with all the existing government social security program in place, the free market does not even have the chance to clear out the malinvestment once and for all and the day of reckoning is being postponed. That's the reason why the boom-bust cycle become shorter because we are not solving the real problem but rather postponing it.TWnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4621870241578115752.post-11369183357270777652011-11-05T18:31:59.032+08:002011-11-05T18:31:59.032+08:00Hi
First of all, I would like to apologize if I h...Hi<br /><br />First of all, I would like to apologize if I have mentioned anything inappropriate in your blog.<br /><br />My view is as below:<br /><br /><br />True Capitalism vs Cronies Capitalism<br />It is my view that capitalism cannot be equalized to cronies capitalism because two system function in different way (although cronies capitalism contains the word capitalism). In true capitalism, the free market function which companies have to compete with each other in price, products, labor and etc. If the company makes a good investment- produce goods that customers wants, the company gains profits. If the company fails to do that, it may goes bankrupt. Bankruptcy is a normal phenomenon in true capitalism. However, in cronies capitalism, the free market could not work because there is no fair competition in the market. Cronies capitalism arises when government has a huge control in planning the economy such as creating government link or sponsored private corporation (GLC). These type of GLCs usually monopoly the market and prevent other competitors to come in due to favoritism from the government. Due to lacking of competition, these GLCs usually become inefficient and do not perform. In true capitalism, these type of companies already collapse. Like Proton, if not because of the country policy that is shielding it from competition, Proton is already in the history book. <br />In short, true capitalism means private profit and private losses whereas cronies capitalism means private profit but socialize losses. So, cronies capitalism can even be renamed to cronies socialism.TWnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4621870241578115752.post-35393507270314690772011-11-03T11:24:08.252+08:002011-11-03T11:24:08.252+08:00TW, 那你就慢慢想清楚才回应,没有必要在这里预告这个、预告那个,请尊重版主和其他人,不要太自我膨胀...TW, 那你就慢慢想清楚才回应,没有必要在这里预告这个、预告那个,请尊重版主和其他人,不要太自我膨胀。至于社会不公,你去搜索一下便知,别告诉我你不会用google。如果你真心要讨论问题,态度请认真一点儿。冷眼https://www.blogger.com/profile/03925267159509264474noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4621870241578115752.post-57895069245980530002011-11-03T08:59:33.485+08:002011-11-03T08:59:33.485+08:00Hi
haha, this is getting more intersting. :)
bef...Hi<br /><br />haha, this is getting more intersting. :)<br /><br />before I get back to you, is it possible for you the list down what the social injustices that you have in mind?<br /><br />ThanksTWnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4621870241578115752.post-33344050634975461192011-11-02T23:55:29.229+08:002011-11-02T23:55:29.229+08:00TW: 谢谢你为我的部落格写了那么长的评语,现回应如下:
1。首先,我从来没有否定资本主义有它的好...TW: 谢谢你为我的部落格写了那么长的评语,现回应如下:<br /><br />1。首先,我从来没有否定资本主义有它的好处(我说过“资本主义也不是一无是处,至少它能够通过竞争提高效率”,并主张“以社会主义为体、资本主义为用”),你在这里一味强调资本主义的好处搔不到痒处。<br /><br />2。我的文章主要探讨平衡经济发展与社会公正,解决眼下的社会不公问题。 你则一直在强调资本主义的效率,却没有提出解决问题的方法。打个比方,我谈的是怎样制造一部行驶安稳、安全可靠的车子,你谈的只是怎样制造一部跑得快的车子。资本积累是资本主义的主要内容,如果没有受到限制,只会造成贫者愈贫富者愈富的局面,像今天世界上的普遍现象那样。<br /><br />3。你说凯恩斯不主张自由市场,没错。问题是,很多时候,政府干预被用在错误的方面,助长了资本主义的恶劣现象,造成了“资本主义为体,社会主义为用”的本末倒置问题。举一个例子,你提到的EPF。EPF就是因政府干预而被用来拯救朋党公司、资助没有效率的企业项目,造成投资缩水、通货膨胀,而累了千千万万的平民百姓。你提到的美国宽松政策导致金融家冒险,也是一例。这些都是国家资本主义现象。<br /><br />4。你说我可以归咎朋党资本主义,却不可指责资本主义。“白马非马”乎?<br /><br />5。你说恐惧可以制约人们的贪念。事实上,两者不会同时存在,贪念会一直膨胀,直至恐惧出现为止,所以才会有繁荣与萧条交替的怪圈。投资大师巴菲特有一句名言就从侧面佐证了我的说法:“Be fearful when others are greedy and greedy when others are fearful”。<br /><br />6。LTCM事件发生在1998年,不是1997。冷眼https://www.blogger.com/profile/03925267159509264474noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4621870241578115752.post-16661356637645782462011-11-01T07:22:39.553+08:002011-11-01T07:22:39.553+08:00Bush once said Wallstreet got drunk. Yes, he was r...Bush once said Wallstreet got drunk. Yes, he was right, Wallstreet got drunk. But the issue is, who liquored them out in the first place? So, at the end of the day, you can say the current crisis we have is because of socialism, cronies capitalism, fascism and other name. But you can't name it is because of capitalism because we haven't even try capitalism. :)<br /><br /><br />PS: I will comment on your suggestion when I have some time. :)<br />各国内部的具体做法应包括增加高收入阶级和企业的税务(如“占领华尔街”运动所提出的向富人征收“巴菲特税”)、向金融投机活动征税、对奢侈品和高档住宅抽重税、减轻低收入阶级税负、给财政赤字设限、增加公共产品与服务的供应和补贴、由国家资助社会服务以弥补企业投资降低所造成的就业缺口、由国家出资建设社会安全网等等。TWnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4621870241578115752.post-10204449914743580422011-11-01T07:21:52.401+08:002011-11-01T07:21:52.401+08:00To your point 2. Yes, you are right. Economy could...To your point 2. Yes, you are right. Economy couldn't be separated from politics at the present day. However, it is for the people to decide how intrusive the government they want. If the people want a big government that taking care on everybody- provides a lot of public goods and services, give subsides, create layers of regulations, create huge social security (like EPF) safety net and many more. You will expect the consequences such as inflation, high taxation, huge government debt, inefficiencies in government operation and etc.<br /><br />The current problem we have is originated from the government because it has distorted (artificially manipulating interest rates, moral hazard created, government intervention fiscal policies) the market to function normally. Adding another layer of regulation and government control will not solve the problem but grow the government bigger. Then you will expect the same result with higher inflation, taxation, government debt, inefficiencies in government operation and etc.TWnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4621870241578115752.post-9947514364592435722011-11-01T07:21:09.956+08:002011-11-01T07:21:09.956+08:00So, what had happened? interest rate down to 1% ma...So, what had happened? interest rate down to 1% made money is easy to be borrowed. Government linked mortgagers Fannie Mae Fredic Mac wanted to increase their profits, they started to lowering their loan standards and lending to subprime market (people with lousy credit) and later sold the loans to other financial institutions. Because these two intuitions were government linked, no people would care the soundness of these two FI because anything went wrong the government would come to the rescue (moral hazard). <br />If the Federal Reserve did not artificially lowered the interest rate compared to the market rate and also created all the moral hazard, all these speculation will be impossible because fearful of loss will control human greedy behavior. And why all asset prices go up at the same time? It is due to the expansionary monetary and fiscal policies adopted by US government indirectly devalue the US dollar. And expansionary monetary and fiscal policies in stimulate the economy from recession is from Keynesian economic theory, it has nothing to do with Capitalism (Keynes didn't believe in free market).TWnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4621870241578115752.post-29781048765356841662011-11-01T07:20:35.802+08:002011-11-01T07:20:35.802+08:00Hi
Thanks. Here are my thoughts.
Commodities and c...Hi<br />Thanks. Here are my thoughts.<br />Commodities and currency speculation are free market phenomenon. However, they are not necessary a bad thing. Why? For example, for a commodity pricing, not all speculators will have the same outlook at the same time. Some will be bullish but some will be pessimistic on the outlook and they will buy or short(sell) in the market respectively. This action actually correct the pricing to market equilibrium. <br />So, why right now all assets classes pricing- properties, stocks, commodities and bonds go up at the same time? To answer this question, I think we must look at the fundamental. Yes, you are right, human is greedy. But human is also fearful of loss. It is the fearful of loss that control our greedy behavior. So, if you minimize the fear of loss, you will get all the riskless speculation. The main reason US property market blew up was because the Federal Reserve (central bank) cut interest to record low at 1% to stimulate US economy from recession in 2003. The Bush administration was campaigning home ownership for all Americans through the government linked mortgager- Fannie Mae and Fredic Mac. Thirdly, the Federal Reserve had set a precedent in saving failed financial institution in 1997- saving Long Term Capital from bankruptcy. This had created moral hazard in wall street.TWnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4621870241578115752.post-74961249904953163772011-11-01T00:22:50.771+08:002011-11-01T00:22:50.771+08:00TW, 本部落格接受匿名者留言,欢迎大家留言!有自己的意见是好的,对错是其次。TW, 本部落格接受匿名者留言,欢迎大家留言!有自己的意见是好的,对错是其次。冷眼https://www.blogger.com/profile/03925267159509264474noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4621870241578115752.post-63903657872790431612011-10-31T19:52:52.973+08:002011-10-31T19:52:52.973+08:00Hi
Yes. This is my first time leave a comment on ...Hi<br /><br />Yes. This is my first time leave a comment on your blog. I saw your article in Malaysiakini. I have different set of opinion, that's the reason I leave my comments. Hopefully you don't mind.<br /><br />TWTWnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4621870241578115752.post-43329416073129074832011-10-31T10:03:58.093+08:002011-10-31T10:03:58.093+08:00楼上的无名氏:请问你是第一次在我的部落格留言吗?楼上的无名氏:请问你是第一次在我的部落格留言吗?冷眼https://www.blogger.com/profile/03925267159509264474noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4621870241578115752.post-85821531447190754642011-10-31T01:34:24.584+08:002011-10-31T01:34:24.584+08:00第一、商品和货币投机活动正是当今的资本主义现象之一,你没有理由不懂。
第二、经济在现实中是不能脱离政...第一、商品和货币投机活动正是当今的资本主义现象之一,你没有理由不懂。<br />第二、经济在现实中是不能脱离政治而独立运转的,你说的“拯救行动”就是政府为了收拾资本主义所造成的残局而做出的。冷眼https://www.blogger.com/profile/03925267159509264474noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4621870241578115752.post-53091263795895730822011-10-31T00:48:04.433+08:002011-10-31T00:48:04.433+08:00Hi
My personal thoughts, you can blame the curren...Hi<br /><br />My personal thoughts, you can blame the current crisis on Crony capitalism, socialism or fascism. But you cannot blame the crisis on capitalism. If the world economy is function in capitalism (let the market to function), there will be no bail out, no speculation on commodities and currency.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4621870241578115752.post-72556854292904029032011-10-30T10:04:49.325+08:002011-10-30T10:04:49.325+08:00深有同感。
马来西亚被困在价值链的低层,无法提供足够的高收入工作。这是收入面问题。
由于贪污腐败以及...深有同感。<br />马来西亚被困在价值链的低层,无法提供足够的高收入工作。这是收入面问题。<br />由于贪污腐败以及朋党资本主义,行业、市场被垄断,加上公共产品与服务素质低下,导致生活费高涨。这是支出面问题。<br />这个困境已存在多年,于今尤烈。冷眼https://www.blogger.com/profile/03925267159509264474noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4621870241578115752.post-87814210119469690232011-10-29T16:12:22.340+08:002011-10-29T16:12:22.340+08:00写得太好了,受教了~
现在全世界的问题除了社会贫富差距的拉大,另外的问题就是社会的流动量减低了
以...写得太好了,受教了~<br /><br />现在全世界的问题除了社会贫富差距的拉大,另外的问题就是社会的流动量减低了<br />以前的人可以通过刻苦耐劳、慢慢打拼,总有一天可以挤上社会金字塔的顶端<br />但现在在不公平的社会下,向上的空间减少了<br />越来越高的生活费、永远跟不上通货膨胀的薪金、官商勾结的社会,除非你有后台,否则要往上挤会很难<br />在日夜苦干的年轻人,却看不到有个美好的未来在前面,反而现在拥有的一切随时会失去掉,社会没有保障,就有了这一次的运动。<br />打个比方,如果香港首富李嘉诚在今天白手起家,面对今天的事势,用他当年刻苦耐劳的方法,他能否复制当年的成功还是个未知数zeushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13401628763150351106noreply@blogger.com